ASEAN region homes the youngest coal power plants in the world. Partial or complete shutdown will give financial challenge to the plant owners/investors and the utility companies who signed construction and operation contracts. The energy security and reliability of the power system would be a huge challenge for the countries and the region. Shutting a large portion of coal power generation down would require large-scale deployment of renewables to be able to supply the energy that is not served by putting coal plants offline.

According to this policy briefing by ASEAN Centre for Energy, establishment of enabling policies and step-by-step phase mechanism that allows stable grid amid high renewable energy penetration is crucial. There are several pathways that could be taken aside from retiring coal plants such as deployment of biomass co-firing, carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS), and high-efficiency low emissions (HELE) technologies, and therefore exploring them in parallel should be an alternate solution to secure the power supply in the transition era.

Excerpts….

ASEAN  region  relies  heavily  on  fossil  fuels  such  as  coal  for  power generation. In 2020, cumulative installed coal power plant capacity in ASEAN is estimated to be around 89.5 GW which   constitutes   about   31 per cent   of   the   region’s   installed   capacity.  Countries  with  huge  coal  fleet  capacity  include  Indonesia (35.2 GW), Vietnam (21.6 GW), Malaysia (12.8 GW), the Philippines (10.9 GW), and Thailand (6.1 GW). According  to  the  6th  ASEAN  Energy  Outlook  (AEO6),  the  region will be needing an additional coal capacity of 29.3 GW from 2020 to 2025 to secure the energy supply of the region under   the   scenario   wherein   the   region   achieves   its   renewable energy and energy efficiency targets.

Around  15 per cent  of  these  capacity  additions  are  subcritical  plants,  64 per cent   are   the   more   efficient   supercritical   plants,   while   the   remaining  shares  are  ultra-supercritical  plants.  This  increasing  share of high-efficiency, low emission (HELE) coal technologies demonstrate  the  commitment  of  AMS  in  making  coal  power  generation   cleaner   and   more   sustainable.   Achieving   the   national  and  regional  policies  led  to  an  estimated  average  emission factor of 1007.9 g-CO2/kWh and 985.97 g-CO2/kWh, respectively in 2040. This emission factor is similar to that of an ultra-supercritical  lignite  plant  in  Thailand  and  a  subcritical  bituminous  plant  in  Vietnam  which  is  a  major  improvement  from a currently operating subcritical lignite plant in Lao PDR at 1404.67 g-CO2/kWh. Meanwhile, the best available technology of  the  region  has  an  emission  factor  of  782.05  g-CO2/kWh  which   belongs   to   a   subcritical   bituminous   plant   in   the   Philippines.  However,  coal  still  contributes  to  about  67 per cent  of  the  emission  from  the  power  sector.  Thus,  on  the  surface,  retiring a portion of unabated coal power plants may seem to be an ideal step for decarbonizing the power system.

Some of the oldest ASEAN coal plants that are still operating at present were built in the 1980s, meaning that these plants will  be  operating  for  about  40  years  within  the  next  years.  Coal   power   plants   have   a   global   average   lifetime   of   approximately  50  years,  therefore  if  well-maintained,  these  plants can still operate for another 10 years. However, in the study  of  Cui  et.  al.,  it  was  found  that  coal  operational  lifetimes must be reduced to 35 years to align with the Paris 2°C goal.

This implies that coal units must be retired after 35 years of service, and this would include the region’s oldest coal plants.One of the challenges in retiring a substantial portion of the existing  coal  plants  is  that  the  ASEAN  region  homes  the  youngest coal power plants in the world, with about 60 per cent of the power plants today operating for only about 10 years or less.

Coal stranded assets and conversion are also other issues to be  addressed  in  the  plants  afterlife.  If  countries  retire  a  portion  of  their  coal  fleets,  another  thing  to  consider  is  to  how to utilize the coal assets after its retirement. It could be by conversion to natural gas plants, biomass, or other clean energy sources. However, financial mechanism must also be put  in  place  to  improve  the  economic  feasibility  of  this  strategy. Immediate  retirement  of  a  large  coal  fleet  will  more  likely  impact the energy security of ASEAN on a wider scale. In the case  where  the  coal  plant  lifetime  is  limited  to  35  years  to  align with the Paris 2°C goal, the region would need to retire 7.8 GW in the next 5 years. Furthermore, if AMS would also decide to cancel the construction of the new coal power that is expected to be built from 2021-2025, that would be a total of 37.1 GW of coal capacity that must be supplemented by renewables and/or natural gas to ensure a stable electricity supply, based on the AEO6 Baseline Scenario.

The  average  plant  age  of  the  ASEAN  coal  fleet  is  about  11.8  years,  estimated  from  the  ASEAN  coal  plant  profiles  from  internal  database.  This  estimate  agrees  with  the  International  Energy  Agency  (IEA)  estimates  for  developing  Asian  economy,  which  calculated  an  average  coal  fleet  age  of  12  years.  For  comparison, the average coal plant life in United States (US) and European Union (EU) are 40 and 35 years, respectively.

Shutting  a  huge  portion  of  coal  fleet  prematurely  will  incur  significant  financial  losses  to  the  plant  owners/investors  and  utility   companies   since   plant   economic   life   is   typically   considered  to  be  25  years  in  sheets  to  return  the  investment.  Meanwhile,   for   plants   running   past   the   breakeven   year   investment  (>25  years)  will  be  faced  with  loss  of  expected  revenue, and this should be another policy gap to consider.  

In   the   context   of   power   sector   investment,   higher   RE   deployment would require an increase USD 86 billion from the estimated  USD  281  billion  investment  requirement  for  the  Baseline  Scenario  up  to  2025  due  to  increased  installation  of  solar and wind power. Aside from capital and operations costs, total  investment  needed  on  variable  renewable  energy  (vRE)  deployment    also    considers    associated    components    that    maintain the reliability and flexibility of the operation.

 

The full report can be downloaded here.